1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
15

What conclusions can be drawn about George Washington’s effectiveness as a leader, based on his experiences before the presidenc

y and the precedents he set after his presidency?
I WILL MOST DEF GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE CORRECT ANSWER!!! PLZ JUST HELP A YOUNGIN OUT
History
1 answer:
Lilit [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

George Washington helped shape the office's future role and powers. he also set both formal and informal precedents for future presidents. Washington believed that it was necessary to strike a delicate balance between making the presidency powerful enough to function effectively in a national government, while also avoiding any image of establishing a monarchy or dictatorship.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did scholars in Muslim lands do from the 700s C.E. to the 1400s? Why is it so important?
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Maybe this helps

Explanation:

With quotes

"The early Muslim conquests also referred to as the Arab conquests and the early Islamic ... The estimates for the size of the Islamic Caliphate suggest it was more than ... In the case of Byzantine Egypt, Palestine and Syria, these lands had been ... Some scholars assert that this is the same Sergius, called "the Candidatus", ..."

5 0
3 years ago
The Declaration of Independence listed 27 injuries that the king of England had inflicted upon the American colonies. Choose one
LenKa [72]
One is imposing taxes on the colonists without their consent. It fits into the context of the Revolutionary period because the colonists received many taxes that they had no idea about and they did not want to pay any of them because they all supported the British and not their own government.
3 0
3 years ago
How do you feel about the Three-Fifths Compromise? Was it a wise decision by the framers of the constitution to keep the nation
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

I think the three-fifths compromise was a poor attempt to delay the inevitable. I think that it would have been better to address slavery sooner. I think it should have been adressed when the constituion and bill of rights were written. I understand that it would have been a divisive issue but if you claim that "All men are created equal" and then turn around and dehuminaze other people than it makes you a hypocrite becuase you cannot just pick and choose who is and who is not considered human.

The three-fifths compromise did not do anything for the rights of the slaves in fact it dehumanized them even more and caused the civil war to start even sooner. If they had at least counted everyone as a human not only would it have possibly delayed the war but there may have been a way to keep the plantation owerners happy by saying they would have to pay anyone who worked for them and could not abuse them. If the slaves were treated as an entire person then they would have gained the population needed for more representation. It would have also helped them get the freedom they desereved and possibly avoid the civil war. It would have also helped the southern economy to have a higher and eventually more educated population. One cause of the civil war was the signfict difference in the economies in the north versus the south.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
What war was NOT fought by the united states, in 1800s
jekas [21]

Answer:

3. The American Revolution

Explanation:

Apr 19, 1775 – Sep 3, 1783 is the date of this war. It is before the 1800s.

4 0
4 years ago
Several acts passed by the British were responsible for bringing social reforms in India.​
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

The first several acts—passed in 1773, 1780, 1784, 1786, 1793, and 1830—were generally known as East India Company Acts. Subsequent measures—chiefly in 1833, 1853, 1858, 1919, and 1935—were entitled Government of India Acts.

John Morley, c. 1890–94. Morley's major reform scheme, the Indian Councils Act of 1909 (popularly called the Morley-Minto Reforms), directly introduced the elective principle to Indian legislative council membership.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an effect of the Reformation? A.Convents were no longer open to the Protestant women needing protectio
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the work life for those living in Europe prior to the Industrial Revolution.
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to Virginia's economy in the 17th century as the importation of slaves increased?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the major outcomes of Shays' Rebellion in 1786 and 1787
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following labor activists founded the American Federation of Labor?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Treaty of Tordesillas do for Portugal?
    13·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP!!
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an agreement from the Cherokee Peace Treaty Conference?
    8·1 answer
  • What does Repeal mean
    7·2 answers
  • Explain two effects on Germany of Stresemann's work to reorganise
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!