The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
35. Organization of American States
Answer:
A manor was the Lord's estate. Manors had to be self sufficient because of how dangerous it was to leave them. One way manors were self sufficient is that they had plenty of farms to grow crops. The manor was also self-sufficient because it provided small houses for the serfs.
Explanation:
Answer:
Andrew Jackson opposed the establishment of a national, federal bank and he would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision. Furthermore, he denied that the ruling prevented him from vetoing legislation extending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson would also have opposed the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden, which he would have said expanded the Congress's power to cover interstate commerce to also include commercial navigation
