1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
4 years ago
13

Which sentence is correctly punctuated?

English
1 answer:
Yakvenalex [24]4 years ago
4 0
Yes the answer is A.
You might be interested in
What kind of figurative language (besides imagery) would the sentence "I will be deaf when my children need my help." be?
Sergio [31]

Answer:

I’m not sure if the quote is from a specific story, but unless the character is literally deaf in it, this is an example of metaphor.

Explanation:

A metaphor is when a word, phrase, etc. is used as a symbol or means something besides it’s literal meaning.

8 0
3 years ago
1972 ÷17 in long division :)
yuradex [85]

Answer:

The number 1972 is called the numerator or dividend, and the number 17 is called the denominator or divisor.

The quotient of 1972 and 17, the ratio of 1972 and 17, as well as the fraction of 1972 and 17 all mean (almost) the same:

1972 divided by 17, often written as 1972/17.

Read on to find the result of 1972 divided by 17 in decimal notation, along with its properties.

We provide you with the result of the division 1972 by 17 straightaway:

1972 divided by 17 = 116

The result of 1972/17 is an integer, which is a number that can be written without decimal places.

1972 divided by 17 in decimal = 116

1972 divided by 17 in fraction = 1972/17

1972 divided by 17 in percentage = 11600%

Note that you may use our state-of-the-art calculator above to obtain the quotient of any two integers or decimals, including 1972 and 17, of course.

Repetends, if any, are denoted in ().

The conversion is done automatically once the nominator, e.g. 1972, and the denominator, e.g. 17, have been inserted.

No need to press the button, unless you want to start over.

Give it a try now with a similar division by 17.

Here we provide you with the result of the division with remainder, also known as Euclidean division, including the terms in a nutshell:

The quotient and remainder of 1972 divided by 17 = 116 R 0

The quotient (integer division) of 1972/17 equals 116; the remainder (“left over”) is 0.

1972 is the dividend, and 17 is the divisor.

In the next section of this post you can find the frequently asked questions in the context of one thousand, nine hundred and seventy-two over seventeen, followed by the summary of our information.

Conclusion

To sum up, 1972/17 = 116. It is a whole number with no fractional part.

As division with remainder the result of 1972 ÷ 17 = 116 R 0.

For questions and comments about the division of 1972 by 17 fill in the comment form at the bottom, or get in touch by email using a meaningful subject line.

If our content has been helpful to you, then you might also be interested in the Remainder of 1974 Divided by 17.

Please push the sharing buttons to let your friends know about the quotient of 1972 and 17, and make sure to place a bookmark in your browser.

Thanks for visiting our article explaining the division of 1972 by 17.

7 0
3 years ago
Is jacket and adjective?
labwork [276]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

"Jacket" is a noun and occasionally a verb. I looked it up in the dictionary

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tammy is passionate about animal safety. Her opponent feels that too much money is spent on helping animals in the neighborhood.
LuckyWell [14K]
Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the effect of Audrey’s parents suing the city to integrate public parks?
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

The effect of Audrey's parents suing the city to integrate public parks was C. The city closed all of its parks.  

Explanation:

The sentence directly after where it states that Audrey's parents sued the city states that the city closed all of its parks. Therefore, the cause is Audrey's parents suing the city, and the effect is the city closed all of its parks.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which part of the sentence is capitalized?
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Essay about travel exerience​
    9·1 answer
  • After Uncle Marcos returns from his flight in the bird, what business does<br> he set up with Clara?
    13·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!! HELP ME PLZZ I NEED HELP WITH THIS!!
    7·2 answers
  • Michael Pollan conducted extensive research in The Omnivore's Dilemma. What research question was he trying to answer throughout
    5·2 answers
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    9·1 answer
  • All of the following are used by the speaker EXCEPT
    7·1 answer
  • Which sentence accurately describes the claim or thesis statement in an analytical essay?
    14·1 answer
  • What is a learning theory?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!