Answer:
Risk-free rate (Rf) = 8%
Return on market portfolio (Rm) = 15%
Beta (β) = 1.2
Ke = Rf + β(Rm - Rf)
Ke = 8 + 1.2(15 - 8)
Ke = 8 + 1.2(7)
Ke = 8 + 8.4
Ke = 16.40%
Earnings per share (EPS) = $10
Current dividend paid (Do) = 40% x $10 = $4
Retention rate (b) = &6/$10 x 100 = 60% = 0.6
ROE (r) = 20% = 0.2
Growth rate (g) = b x r
= 0.6 x 0.2
= 0.12 = 12%
Current market price (Po)
= Do<u>(1 + g) </u>
Ke - g
= $4<u>(1 + 0.12)</u>
0.1640 - 0.12
= $4<u>(1.12)</u>
0.044
= $101.82
Explanation:
First and foremost, we need to calculate the cost of equity based on capital asset pricing model. Then, we will determine the growth rate, which is a function of retention rate (b) and return on equity(r).
Finally, we will calculate the current market price, which is dividend paid, subject to growth, divided by the excess of cost of equity over growth rate.
Answer:
The correct answer is the third option: Lawyer - Probation Officer - Firefighter
Explanation:
First of all, the lawyer is the one who requires more years of schooling due to the fact that in order to be it the person must go to college after graduating from high school. Secondly, the probation officer is formed during years as well. And finally the firefighter is the one who does not need so many years of schooling because the person can go and have the training to be it right after he finished high school.
In forward and futures contracts, the risk of non-fulfillment of contract terms is most likely borne by <u>both parties</u><u> to the contract</u>.
<h3>What are forward and futures contracts?</h3>
The difference between a forward and futures contract lies in their establishment.
A forward contract is a personal arrangement traded over the counter whereas, a futures contract is a standardized contract made through an established exchange.
Thus, in forward and futures contracts, the risk of non-fulfillment of contract terms is most likely borne by <u>both parties</u><u> to the contract</u>.
Learn more about forward and futures contacts at brainly.com/question/15581105
#SPJ12
Development, Structure and powers of U.S constitution and Arizona constitution have a huge comparison.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Unlike the United States Constitution, which was embraced in 1787, that wasn't until 1912 that perhaps the Arizona Constitution was accepted, leading to the creation of the 48 states
The common terms,' we the people' all constitutions begin with, but include many different things. After all, there were certain differences between one condition and another for a set of fifty.
The Arizona Constitution states that the legislature must be split into three parts-Legislative, Legislative and executive–which are not applicable to the United States Constitution
Many think of forms to deny or expel someone from office. They will enforce them in both Constitutions. All define the qualifications for their office if they would like to run for office. Another connection that I found was apparent but significant nonetheless.
They both mention the theme of religious liberty, one of the most valuable values in our society. Eventually, both inspire their lawmakers to negotiate with them.
