Evidence of the negative effects of technology on the environment is the increase in technological waste that pollutes nature.
<h3>What is an evidence?</h3>
An evidence is a term that refers to a proof that supports a hypothesis, that is, a true argument that can be verified.
<h3>How are evidence and essay related?</h3>
The evidences are related to the essays because they help to argue the author's points of view regarding a topic so that it is valid and verifiable. For example:
- If we want to verify that technology has had a negative impact on the environment, we can find that it is true because it has generated pollution by technological waste in nature.
Learn more about essays in: brainly.com/question/20441249
#SPJ1
Answer: in opposition of the tariff of 1828
Explanation: just took the quiz
The security council is the most responsible for keeping peace
Answer: peration Barbarossa (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa) also known as the German invasion of the Soviet Union was the code name for the invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany and some of its Axis allies, which started on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during World War II.
Explanation:
McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.
The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)
<u><em>Have a good day, afternoon or night!</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<em> ~Dreamer1331~</em>
