1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
siniylev [52]
3 years ago
11

Though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common?the government has a heavy b

urden to prove harm.the government can limit speech that causes harm.the government has unlimited power to limit speech.the government must follow the first amendment.
History
2 answers:
podryga [215]3 years ago
4 0

B. The government can limit speech that causes harm.


I took the test

Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is "The government can limit speech that causes harm".

The outcome of United States vs The New York Times, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the The New York Times and let them publish classified Pentagon Papers, created a precedent that the government cannot restrict freedom of speech. However, during the outcome of United States vs Shenck, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, as it considered that the words printed in the newspaper represented a "clear and present danger" to society.

You might be interested in
How does this photograph reflect the Tiananmen Square incident?
sweet-ann [11.9K]
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.

Based on the attached photograph the <span>reflect the Tiananmen Square incident is the second one. 

</span><span>It shows the determination of the protestors and how the Chinese military overwhelmed them.
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He was the mastermind of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

c. Osama Bin Laden

Explanation:

He was the one that plotted the entire thing.

3 0
1 year ago
What was the ruling in the Supreme Court case of tick wo v. Hopkins
brilliants [131]
"Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
8 0
2 years ago
How long did ww2 last
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

6 years

1939-1945

MARK ME BRAINLIEST FOLLOW ME

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is the reason why a Republican candidate won the 1896 presidential election instead of a Democrat or a Po
igomit [66]
The answer is B



Hope that helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to daniel roselle what are two ways islam improved the lives of people in spain
    5·2 answers
  • How big is a ziggurat?
    12·1 answer
  • N 1712, a split within a southern colony led to the creation of
    7·1 answer
  • Which best explains why the United States sent troops to fight in Vietnam? (USH 8.1.2.d) A. They attacked Pearl Harbor B. The Do
    12·1 answer
  • Why is Stephen F. Austin considered the "Father of Texas"?
    10·2 answers
  • Was Andrew carnige a hero or villian?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the geography of East Asia benefit the people of ancient China?
    5·2 answers
  • How do American citizens exercise popular sovereignty?
    14·1 answer
  • Poema completo palabras que reflejan ideas religiosas de garcilaso de la Vega<br>​
    8·1 answer
  • What is something said by or about the Regulators of South Carolina?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!