D is the answer just so you know
The correct answer is True
Explanation:
The National Response Framework (NRF) refers to a set of principles and strategies design to respond to disasters or emergy situations as well as preventing the effects this can have. This includes response to situations such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, terrorist attacks, etc.
Additionally, the NRF is guided by five key principles or premises that include readiness to act; a partnership between entities and levels; unity of effort; efficiencies or tired response and flexibility, scalability and adaptability that implies the NRF should be able to expand at all levels and adapt to the context and emergency being faced. Thus, it is a true statement one of the premises of the NRF ist that the response should expand to meet needs.
He is frightened. He doesn't know what to expects and fears for himself.
Answer:
Rivalry among existing competitor
Explanation:
Porter has given five forces that can shape or manage any type of industry. These forces help the industry to find its strengths and weakness. If someone wants to grow their industry then should know about these five forces that help in identifying industry structure and determine the corporate strategy. These strategy used in any segment to know the benefits and losses of the industry. The name was given after Michael E. Porter.
<u>Five forces are there:
</u>
- competition in the industry.
- Potential of new product in the industry
- Supply powers
- The threat of the substitutes
- Depend on customer power
Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
