Answer:
Cleisthenes, “The Father of Democracy,” was one of ancient Greece's most enduring contributions to the modern world.
NOT a reason Jefferson decided to purchase the Louisiana Territory: A. The purchase aligned with his strict constructionist views.
Explanation/context:
Jefferson was uncertain as to whether he had constitutional authority to accept the treaty. Thomas Jefferson was a "strict constructionist." In other words, he believed that we ought only do what is strictly outlined in the Constitution. Loose constructionists, by contrast, believed that we are free to take an action if that action is not specifically prohibited by the Constitution. Because of Jefferson's views on how to interpret and abide by the Constitution, it's no surprise that he had some hesitancy about proceeding with the Louisiana Purchase. He thought the matter should be brought to the American people for them to approve a constitutional amendment. However, others in government didn't view the matter the same way, and eventually the treaty was ratified.
The treaty, as negotiated by James Monroe and Robert Livingston on behalf of the USA, was announced on July 4, 1803. The Senate ratified the treaty in October, 1803, after disregarding President Jefferson's draft for an amendment to the Constitution.
Ultimately, Jefferson was convinced by others in his administration. In a statement he made at the time, Jefferson justified the purchase with this analogy: "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
Answer:
Industrial Revolution gave European countries a way to mass produce products. It could be anything from clothing to producing weapons. Because of the steam engine, England had a lot of advantages over none industrialized European countries. For example, England would also imperialize other non-industrialization nations to have gain natural resources.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Evaluate the success of the Constitutional principles of separation of powers and checks and balances in addressing concerns about the government under the Articles of Confederation
In reality, it was successful because the Articles of Confederation had many deficiencies. For instance, under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. The states were the ones that were sovereign and independent and has the advantage that they could collect taxes. Congress couldn't. So if the government needed money, it was through the states.
So when the delegates met at the Constitutional Congress of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, they debated the best form of government for the United States and decided to have a division of powers under the system of checks and balances in which none of the branches had more power over the others.
Answer:
people have the right to life, liberty, and property