A difference between the political systems in ancient Greece and ancient Rome?

History

2 answers:

frutty [35]3 years ago

8 0

Rome was a republic and a monarchy

Greece was a democracy and oligarchy

ivolga24 [154]3 years ago

3 0

<h3>Difference between the political systems in ancient Rome and ancient Greece:</h3>

Ancient Greece:

Ancient Greece was more committed to democratic ideals.

Ancient Greece used to follow a common system for Greek government as Democracy, Monarchy, Oligarchy, Tyranny.

The government which Ancient Greece followed was Republic, Parliamentary system and constitutional republic.

Democracy was first derived from the "Greek word demos" which explains the whole citizen body.

Ancient Rome:

Ancient Rome consisted of Oligarchy, Autocracy, Theocracy and Absolute monarchy sort of government.

The roman Republic is famous for classical Roam civilization which began to over throw the Roman Kingdom.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!!!!!

Norma-Jean [14]

D. Who led the Visigoths when they invaded Rome?

Alaric

6 0

3 years ago

What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)

soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

The results of a government NOT ADHERING to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government NOT ADHERING to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where did cultures in Africa develop that were not affected by Islam

xxTIMURxx [149]

I believe in Nubia and Ethiopia, according the World Civilizations AP Edition.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How was jeffersons foreign policy challenged?

ikadub [295]

In the Chesapeake Affair of 1807, a major challenge to American neutral rights.