Answer:
Indian removal was a forced migration in the 19th century whereby Native Americans were forced by the United States government to leave their ancestral homelands in the eastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, specifically to a designated Indian Territory (roughly, modern Oklahoma).
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! XDDDDDDDDDD
Answer:
as prices rose, less and less people were able to buy things,
unsold things piled up, so there was no need for production
in all, no one was working or buying, and this caused the economy to crash
Answer:
D. Confederal
Explanation:
It can't be federal because it is the opposite. The federal government doesn't get involved that much in what separate states do with themselves. Presidential is also not the answer because the president doesn't get to control states. It is not Unitary because it still answers to some parts of the federal government. It is a confederal government.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "-show North Vietnam that the United States was serious about the Paris peace talks." American leaders hoped that Nixon's Vietnamization program would have the following three results <span>-show North Vietnam that the United States was serious about the Paris peace talks</span>
When businesses compete everything is great. Eventually one of the businesses in a field gets bigger. And bigger. And bigger. It buys out it's competitors. It monopolizes it's niche filed, sometimes even spreading to others.<span>Since money will no longer be used, people will have access to all of the resources they need, and there will no longer be a state to protect the capitalist's private property, I find it extremely unlikely that a worker would want to exchange his labor for a wage. The way I see it, it would be like playing pretend. The situation would be similar to if a group of people in the United States declared their friend Tim the king of Arkansas.</span>
