1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
13

Which best describes the stance of most Northern states on protective tariffs in the years leading up to the Civil War? a)They o

pposed tariffs because they would make raw materials more expensive. b)They supported tariffs because they would help Northern goods compete with foreign goods. c)They opposed tariffs because they would help foreign goods compete with Northern goods. d)They supported tariffs because they would increase the price of goods sold in the South.
History
2 answers:
dexar [7]3 years ago
5 0

actually the answer is B

CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
4 0
T<span>he stance of most Northern states on protective tariffs in the years leading up to the Civil War D) </span><span>supported tariffs because they would increase the price of goods sold in the South.</span>
You might be interested in
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
3 years ago
In which event were Native Americans and escaped slaves most involved?
Svetradugi [14.3K]
The First Seminol war
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Jane Addams recommend that settlement house “residents” (staffers) treat their mostly immigrant clientele?
lys-0071 [83]

In 1889, in Chicago’s West Side, on Halsted Street in the middle of an immigrant neighborhood in the Nineteenth Ward, <u>Jane Addams</u> and her college friend, <u>Ellen Gates Starr</u> established the most famous of the settlement houses, Hull-House. Rapidly, it became the model for others houses. <u>Based on that experience, she did valuable recommendations for social work with immigrants</u>: 1. Add American culture to the immigrants’ native cultures, not to replace them. 2. Provide vocational instruction in sewing, basket weaving, millinery, embroidery, crafts, cooking, and dressmaking for women. 3. Provide health, food, legal and clothing assistance. 4. Offer English, American citizenship and culture classes. 5. Give prominence to immigrants' children through multiple programs in kindergarten classes, boys' and girls' clubs, reading groups, art and drama, college extension courses, along with public baths, a labor museum, a gymnasium, and playground.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the first immigrants come, and what happened between them and the native people
Inga [223]
The first immigrants came to America looking for gold and for a new passage to the West Indies. The natives were seen as problem and were dealt with very harshly by the first immigrants, the Spaniards.
5 0
3 years ago
What was the turning point of World War II in the Pacific? Explain in detail
dem82 [27]

Explanation:

The turning point in the Pacific war came with the American naval victory in the Battle of Midway in June 1942. The Japanese fleet sustained heavy losses and was turned back. (hopefully this helps(

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did willson have touble convincing the other allied powers to agree with his plan
    8·1 answer
  • Help asap! will mark brainliest!
    7·2 answers
  • What country did truman refer to in the first paragraph of the speech - iron curtain speech
    15·1 answer
  • Mark the statement if it describes a change that took place in Rome after the end of the Punic Wars.
    12·2 answers
  • What would be a problem with Britain fighting on 2<br> different continents
    11·2 answers
  • Help asap will give BRAINLIEST
    13·1 answer
  • Question 2
    11·1 answer
  • 13. The Spartans greatest virtue was
    13·1 answer
  • 2. The Indian conflicts in the West—especially in the Great Plains—arose because Native Americans and settlers had completely di
    7·1 answer
  • Which industries saw the most strikes? Why do you think that is?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!