Why the three colonial regions ( New England,middle, and south developed differently?

2 answers:

6 0

The climate and such affected what was available. The New England colonies barley farmed as it was almost impossible, but they could trap for fur, could fish, shipbuild etc. much better than the southern colonies for example. This meant that each region kind of "specialized" in some things, and to get things unavailable to your region you would have to trade with someone from a different region.

Bezzdna [24]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

How were New England middle and southern colonies different?

The Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves. This is true because there was more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming. Thus, another difference is the kind of farming done.

Explanation:

use own words

You might be interested in

Why did Henry VIII seek an annulment from Catherine?

topjm [15]

Answer:

Henry's motive behind the annulment was his need for an heir to the throne.

3 0

3 years ago

Which city-state granted citizenship to women

valkas [14]

Answer:

SPARTA

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

The early Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups of this era because the Bantu

krok68 [10]

The early Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups of this era because the Bantu….

Answer: The reason why the Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups was because the Bantu established complex social systems. Women farmed, men mostly tended cattle. Cattle food source and ritual sacrifices. Status in Bantu societies determined by size of cattle herds. Also thanks to their acquired knowledge of agriculture and ironworking they established themselves as a dominant group.

I hope it helps, Regards.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help . . .

inysia [295]

Answer:

Turkey

Explanation:

Hope this helps plz hit the crown ;D

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Was advocating for socialism during the war equivalent to falsely shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre? explain.

Svetach [21]

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a popular metaphor for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating unnecessary panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago