History has shown us that Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai <u>did </u><u>not share </u><u>the same </u><u>motives </u><u>for </u><u>supporting </u><u>the provisional </u><u>government</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai in 1911</h3>
- Both men were very influential in calls for the end of the Qing dynasty.
- Sun Yat-Sen was a strong believer in the need for China to modernize and change its governance in other to develop.
While Sun Yat-Sen had better motives for China in mind, Yuan Shigai did not and when he took over, he became increasingly authoritarian and even tried to proclaim himself emperor.
In conclusion, they did not have the same motives.
Find out more on Sun Yat-Sen at brainly.com/question/780808.
I believe the answer is: its supply or demand is not sensitive to price changes
A goods would fall under inelastic category if that product is considered as basic/primary needs for most consumers.
Example of such goods is food and water. No matter how much the price of food and water rises, the demand for this goods would stay relatively stagnant because people have to use them to survive.
<span>I am pretty agree with your answers except the first one. As you know </span>Ten Offensive was one of the, or even the hugest military campaigns during <span>Vietnam War that controlled everything throughout South Vietnam, so this is the point.</span><span>
1. </span>Ten Offensive
<span>2.Credibility gap
</span>3. His popularity was low because of the Vietnam War
I strongly believe the answer is C. Because they both became the richest and most powerful country.
Answer:
Helped with transportation of goods and people.
Explanation:
The transportation of goods made it easier to take food it other things across the states and could even carry people to other states faster than horseback or any other mode at that time.
