Answer:
4.96%
Explanation:
In order to determine the component after-tax cost of debt first we need to compute the before tax cost of debt by applying the RATE formula which is to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,155
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 8.25% ÷ 2 = $41.25
NPER = 40 years × 2 = 80 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula
1. The pretax cost of debt is 3.54% × 2 = 7.08%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 7.08% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 4.96%
<span>Which skills would be the most beneficial for a computer help desk technician?
</span>
<span>B. research skill</span>
Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.
To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.
It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.
Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.
Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
Sustainable Growth Rate: 2.5%
Explanation:
Sustainable growth rate is calculated by multiplying return on equity with retention ratio.
Logic behind above is that whatever portion of net profit is retained by the Company, is used in the Company's operations, which earns certain percentage of equity known as return on equity. By multiplying both return on equity with retention ratio, we assume that the practice will continue for foreseeable future and the Company will continue to grow at the calculated growth rate.
Growth rate = Retention ratio * return on equity
Retention ratio = 50%
Return on equity = Net profit available for distribution / Opening equity
Return on Equity = (25,000 * 10%) / 50,000
Return on Equity = 5%
Growth Rate = 5% * 50%
Growth Rate = 2.5%
