Answer: 1. No.
2. Yes.
Explanation:
Price Discrimination is a pricing strategy where suppliers/producers or sellers sell a good to different people at different prices depending largely on their preference and/or capacity to pay for the commodity i.e, if you want it more, you are charged more.
1. Johnny did not like to play Hopscotch, so offering Suzie one day of Hopscotch for two days of bug hunting is fair and no price discrimination occured as he did not offer these terms to someone else who's game he did not like.
2. Sam knew that Johnny really liked playing Slaps so he leveraged on that and offered him more expensive terms so to speak than he did to Bill even though he liked playing the both games equally. This means that he charged Johnny more than Bill simply because Johnny liked and preferred his game alot which is Price discrimination.
Answer: 2016 CPI is 110
Explanation:
Given the following :
Base year = 2012
Cost of basket in 2012 = $50
Cost of basket in 2014 = $52
Coat of basket in 2016 = $55
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is calculated using the formula :
CPI = (weighted cost item in current period / weighted cost of item in base period) × 100
Base period / year = 2012
Current period = 2016
Therefore, 2016 CPI equals;
($55 / $50) × 100
= 110
Answer:
The answer is b) how technology is best used in the production of goods and services
Explanation:
The concept of welfare economics is used in the context of the Economy and public finances. It is defined as the branch of the economy that tries to determine the conditions that are needed to reach the maximum of social welfare. For this, the conditions are established to maximize production with a given amount of resources and optimization of the distribution of goods and services, analyzing the policies pursued in the achievement of goals that are considered desirable from the point of view of well-being.
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
Answer:
The explicit tax would Curtis incur on interest earned on the Initech, Inc. bond is $7,395
Explanation:
The computation of the explicit tax is shown below:
= (Invested amount × interest rate with similar risk) × marginal tax rate
= ($425,000 × 7.25%) × 24%
= $30,812.50 × 24%
= $7,395
We consider the invested amount, similar risk interest rate, and the marginal tax rate. The paying interest rate would not be considered. Hence, ignore it
