Answer: 0.000
Step-by-step explanation:
C) (0.85 + x/100)(250+145) does not give the correct answer.
Explanation
A) works; adding the two costs together is 250+145=395. We multiply this by 0.85 because 100%-15%=85%=0.85. We also have x% tax, which is represented by x/100, added to 100% of the value, or 1.00. Altogether this gives us
395(0.85)(1+x/100) = 395(0.85 + (0.85x/100)) = 395(0.85) + 395(0.85x/100)
= 395(0.85) + 395(0.0085x)
B) works; we have 250+145 for the original price; we have 85% = 0.85 of the value; we also have 100% + x%, which is (100+x)/100.
C) does not work; (0.85+x/100)(395) does not take into consideration that you are finding the tax after taking the 85%. This will simplify out to
0.85*395 + (x/100)(395) = 335.75 + 395x/100 = 335.75 + 3.95x, which is too much.
D) works; simplifying the expression from A, we have 395(0.85) + 395(0.0085x) = 335.75 + 3.3575x.
Answer: 567
Step-by-step explanation: cause im smart i think
Hey!
We can round 75,364 to 75,000 and 472,756 to 473,000
75,000 + 473,000 = 548,000
So, the answer is B. 548,000 =)
So to answer you just have to substitute all the given choices into the formula and see which come out true.
2(1) - 3(-3) >_ 12
2 + 9 >_ 12
11 >_ 12
XNXOXPXEX
2(8) - 3(1) >_ 12
16 - 3 >_ 12
13 >_ 12
VYVEVSV
2(3) - 3(2) >_ 12
6 - 6 >_ 12
0 >_ 12
XNXOXPXEX
2(-2) - 3(-6) >_ 12
-4 + 18 >_ 12
14 >_ 12
VYVEVSV
2(2) - 3(3) >_ 12
4 - 9 >_ 12
-5 >_ 12
XNXOXPXEX
2(1) - 3(8) >_ 12
2 - 24 >_ 12
-22 >_ 12
XNXOXPXEX
2(-3) - 3(1) >_ 12
-6 - 3 >_ 12
-9 >_ 12
XNXOXPXEX
VYVEVSV = yes
XNXOXPXEX = nope
