I'd say this is a civil law, since it's power is limited to around only a community.
Starting in 1939, any nation fighting in World War II could purchase goods and arms in the United States under the "Lend-Lease" program or act.
Countries such as Britain, China, the Soviet Union, Brazil among others received weapons under this program.
According to the Neutrality Act the U.S can not receive any compensation for the arms. Instead, they covertly were present in the war and defend its own interests by giving arms and other goods to the countries they specifically chose.
Answer:
The general opinion of many Americans at the time of the purchase was that Jefferson was being hypocritical by going through with it. Jefferson was known to have a strict interpretation of the Constitution and believed the president only had the powers the Constitution gave him. Since there was no Constitutional precedent for buying land to add territory to the United States, there was theoretically no Constitutional authority for the president to buy the land.
Many of those in the Federalist party (the opposing party to Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans) believed that he would have objected on Constitutional grounds if any of them had tried to do the same thing. Therefore, the Federalists were very much opposed to the purchase. They also believed that by buying land from France, they would alienate Great Britain, whom they wanted as a close ally.
Answer:
3 it is the real answer ok bro
The answer is B. E can be eliminated because their ideas originate from the teachings and preachings of Locke. D can be too because no slaves were discussed. Very few, if any Latin phrases were used. If I recall correctly, there are none. A can be eliminated because the navy is not heavily discussed. However, the abuse of power in the hands of a tyrant is discussed.