This is a matter of opinion.
If you think yes, you could argue that internment was a great PR move and/or that it protected the Japanese living in America from negative press
If you argue no (which I would) then you could argue that it was unconstitutional and/or had no strategic importance to the war itself.
Answer:
Arnold was killed and Montgomery was wounded in the seize of Quebec.
Explanation:
During the Battle of Quebec, on 31st of December 31, 1775, Colonel Benedict Arnold and General Richard Montgomery failed the capture Quebec.
<u>In the process of Quebec seizure, Montgomery was killed, and Arnold was wounded</u> (he later died in 1801.) The option placed here suggests it was another way around, which is why it isn't true.
During the war, the British army did gain control of Canada and it is considered to be one of the biggest losses of the American army in history.
Answer:
the thought of having independence would make a patriot soldier keep fighting even under terrible conditions
Explanation:
Because they had it thought out a land attack would have been costly and millions would have died so we had to choose the lesser of 2 evils... thousands to die. plus this was the only way to get the japs to surrender they were known for their fight to the death mentality