Answer:
It uses everyday things, items like iPhones or tablets, sensors and market to find the place of physical items and then suggest where to put virtual objects.
This might be a little off since I'm not very familiar with business stuff, but I hope this helps.
Answer:
Advertisement doesn't exist in perfect competition markets. Perfect competition markets are theoretical only, since they do not exist in reality although some markets resemble or are similar, e.g. commodities. One of the characteristics of perfect competition markets is that every participant possesses perfect information regarding the products' characteristics and price. If everyone knows a product perfectly, then there is no reason why you should advertise it.
Explanation:
Scarcity exists when there are limited resources available to satisfy all the competing uses.
<h3>What is scarcity?</h3>
When the demand for a resource or a product is more than its actual supply in the market, such a condition in the market is regarded as scarcity. For example, in deserted regions there is a scarcity of water.
Hence, the significance of scarcity is aforementioned.
Learn more about scarcity here:
brainly.com/question/13186252
#SPJ1
Answer:
d.Expenses for travel as a form of education are not deductible.
Explanation:
Expenses in the nature of travel, are not allowed while the travel might be for the purpose of education.
This is because it is not in the nature of direct expense.
As the expense for the purpose of business which are important for the business to pursue in a more positive manner is preferable and essential for the business.
As extra education and knowledge provide excellence to perform the task for which knowledge is acquired.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
