The setting in paragraphs 26 and 27 helps to the development of the plot because it provides the story with an interesting twist and it arises a conflict.
The last dog is a short story by Katherine Paterson, in this story, humans live in a sealed dome and are not allowed to go outside as it is considered to be dangerous. In this context, one curious man decides to leave the dome and explore the outside world.
In paragraphs 26 and 27 of this story, the narrator describes how the main character Brocks finds some hills with trees and later a brook. This finding is extremely interesting because the character had been through trees and freshwater did not exist anymore, and therefore he is quite surprised to find these elements.
This discovery helps develop the plot of the story because it is an unexpected twist and it arises a conflict because the character starts questioning previous ideas such as:
- Considering the outside as dangerous.
- Believing life is not possible outside the dome.
Learn more about story in: brainly.com/question/7037227
Answer:Peer Pressure Kept Them From the Party
Ghoul and ghost were way up high on a walnut tree limb.
Owl flew up, intending to go to the haunted house, straight in.
Jack-o-lantern head saw his friends, and climbed up to join them.
What are we doing here? He asked his friends in a whisper slim.
We’re scared of the party, Owl said as he took a bumpy limb seat.
Skeleton came outside the house and tried to entice them with a treat.
But the four stayed up there the entire Halloween night.
None could get over their intense peer pressure fright.
Explanation:
Isn't this supposed to be in a text??
Sry but idk the answer
Answer:
Katniss puts her family first, which means she cares about them more than herself, since she volunteered for the Hunger Games for her sister wouldn't go.
She's also very resourceful, and uses her environment to help her survive
Katniss is also respectful to those who give her respect first.
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. incomplete comparison.
Explanation:
In the example, there can certainly exist a logical relation between the two propositions (inquisitive students - make - better students), however, since there is not enough information, a logical relation between them cannot be properly constructed. If the comparison presented some sort of argument then it would be complete. For instance: "Inquisitive children, <em>since they are more curious and open to learning</em>, make better students". Without the argument, the idea seems more like an unsustained opinion, based on prejudice, than anything else.
