Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
Option D
Step-by-step explanation:
In the first three options we can evaluate the values of x with the help of Sine Rule for all the triangles
The Rule says
Where a , b and c are the sides opposite to the angles A, B and C of any ΔABC.
Hence , in order to determine unknown values of sides or angles , we need any 3 values from all 3 sides and 3 angles in a triangle. First Three options give us three values but the last option gives only 2.
Example
in first option we can apply Sine Rule as
Answer:
$85
Step-by-step explanation:
$35 + $1 x 50 guests = $85
Answer:
y = -3/4x - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
y = -3/4x + b
1 = (-3/4) × -4 + b
1 = 3 + b
-2 = b
b = -2
y = -3/4x -2
Answer:
Rate of change of the area of the square is 42 units at t = 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
We note that the area of the square is given by: but we aim to find . But we can use the chain rule to pull out that dA/dt. Doing so gives us:
Now, (by the power rule and
But since we have "x" and not "t", we want to find what x is when t = 2. Substituting t = 2 gives us x(2) = 3(2) + 1 = 7.
So, finally, we see that: