It suggests that Americans are in danger of losing their rights.
It predicts that the enemy will try to take away free speech.
It implies that the US will lose the war if Americans do not buy war bonds.
When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
Answer: To block, impede, prevent
Explanation: Vocab
Answer:
A. To emphasize the importance of finding peace with the Indians and take pride in how long the agreement lasted
Explanation:
The most likely intent of the author to include the entire treaty deal the Pilgrims made with Squanto is to show how important peace was and to show how successful he was at brokering a treaty with the Indians and how long it lasted.
If you gave more detail i could answer this question. if needed
