When Gilgamesh is inspired by the words of Enkidu's and starts yelling while swinging his axe shows that Gilgamesh is a fierce warrior.
<h3>Who is a warrior?</h3>
A warrior is someone who fights to gain the fruitful results for the society, which has a bigger purpose than just fighting. Additionally, a warrior does not necessarily belong to the army.
The qualities of a warrior are to recover quickly from the backlashes and start fighting for the purpose again. Similarly, Gilgamesh shows that he is a warrior when he is inspired to swing his axe again.
Thus, option B holds true of the fact that Gilgamesh is a fierce warrior.
Learn more about a warrior here:
brainly.com/question/18562598
#SPJ1
How the protagonist's conflict is resolved is generally the focus of a solution.
The context refers to the irresponsibility of the noble class and the church towards the poor people of Ireland. As 21st-century readers, we can understand that Swift was making a social critique of the exploitation and abandonment of the lower social classes.
<h3>How does Swift establish his criticism?</h3>
- He writes a text showing how the noble class and the church are hypocrites.
- They show how these classes see the poor with a problem but are not willing to solve the problem.
- It shows how irresponsible people are to those most in need.
For Swift, poverty was created by the bad division of income and possessions in Ireland. This is because the upper social classes and the clergy owned all the wealth of the country and did not share it with society. This pettiness promoted the lower classes who did not have the resources to change their situation but were seen as a problem for those who could change it.
This question is incomplete. The full question is "How important is the context here? How can we, as 21st-century readers, begin to understand the true intent of Swift's piece “A Modest Proposal"?
More information about “A Modest Proposal” at the link:
brainly.com/question/3413489
When paraphrasing, you’ll
never want to compose an identical copy of the original text because that would
not be paraphrasing at all; that would be quoting. If you pick and choose what ideas to include
and not include, if you leave some out, then things may be taken out of context
and you’d be misrepresenting the original material. You’d, too want to never change the order of
ideas and sentences because when paraphrasing, you’ll need to keep the order of
the ideas the same; you’d just need to present them in your own words. Thus, you’d want to accurately restate the
facts, and you’ll never want to include your opinion on the matter because when
you paraphrase, you’ll only present the author’s ideas, not your own.
It is a noun definition: the study of the way in which certain body movements and gestures serve as a form of nonverbal communication (such as blushes, shrugs, or eye movement)
