They made gun powder and wood block printing <span />
Closely linked
third answer
Answer:
The person, usually the mother or a daughter, who spends a lot of time emailing family members, visiting friends and families, and organizing family gatherings during special events like birthdays and anniversaries is called a A) kin-keeper.
Explanation:
<u>Kinkeepers</u> are those family members that protect and promote family relationships, encourage family tradition, nurture family history and provide support for the whole family. Traditionally, this role falls to the mother or the oldest daughter, although it is not restricted to them.
The correct answer would be option B, Many of the unhappy things in people's lives are partly due to bad luck.
The above mentioned belief indicated the external locus of control.
Explanation:
The extent to which people think that they have or have not control over the outcomes of events in their lives. There are two types of locus of control:
- External Locus of Control
- Internal Locus of Control
In external locus of control, people believe that they don't have any control over the events happening in their lives and all such events are happening due to the luck, fate, circumstances, injustice, etc. On the contrary, people with internal locus of control believe that everything happening in their lives are due to their own selves.
So in the given question, option B gives us the best example of the external locus of control, in which it is said that Many of unhappy things in people's lives are partly due to bad luck. So it means the people believe that bad things are happening due to their luck, which is an external factor and is out of their control.
Learn more about locus of control at:
brainly.com/question/1182564
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
