In the social, framing comprises a set of concepts and theoretical perspectives on how individuals, groups, and societies, organize, perceive, and communicate about reality. Framing involves social construction of a a social phenomenon – by mass media sources, political or social movements, political leaders, or other actors and organizations. Participation in a language community necessarily influences an individual's perception of the meanings attributed to words or phrases. Politically, the language communities of advertising, religion, and mass media are highly contested, whereas framing in less-sharply defended language communties might evolve imperceptibly and organically over cultual time frames, with fewer overt modes of disputation.
Framing itself can be framed in one of two ways, depending on whether one chooses to emphasise processes of thought or processes of interpersonal communication. Frames in thought consist of the mental representations, interpretations, and simplifications of reality. Frames in communication consist of the communication of frames between different actors.
One can view framing in communication as positive or negative – depending on the audience and what kind of information is being presented. The framing may be in the form of equivalence frames, where two or more logically equivalent alternatives are portrayed in different ways (see framing effect) or emphasis frames, which simplify reality by focusing on a subset of relevant aspects of a situation or issue.
In the case of "equivalence frames", the information being presented is based on the same facts, but the "frame" in which it is presented changes, thus creating a reference-dependent perception.
The effects of framing can be seen in many journalism applications. With the same information being used as a base, the "frame" surrounding the issue can change the reader's perception without having to alter the actual facts. In the context of politics or mass-media communication, a frame defines the packaging of an element of rhetoric in such a way as to encourage certain interpretations and to discourage others. For political purposes, framing often presents facts in such a way that implicates a problem that is in need of a solution. Members of political parties attempt to frame issues in a way that makes a solution favoring their own political leaning appear as the most appropriate course of action for the situation at hand.
In social theory, framing is a schema of interpretation, a collection of anecdotes and stereotypes, that individuals rely on to understand and respond to events. In other words, people build a series of mental "filters" through biological and cultural influences. They then use these filters to make sense of the world. The choices they then make are influenced by their creation of a frame.
Framing is also a key component of sociology, the study of social interaction among humans. Framing is an integral part of conveying and processing data on a daily basis. Successful framing techniques can be used to reduce the ambiguity of intangible topics by contextualizing the information in such a way that recipients can connect to what they already know.
Answer:
Martian Luther King Jr- the maning of the message in this speach is that they didnt have equal rights and thats what they wanted, just to be treated equally.
malala's speach was effecive because she used hummor -from the quote:im suprised i won the nobel peace prize because i fight with my brothers all the time.Malala yousafzai one a nobel prize and gave speach about the importance of education.
Explanation:
They both have a huge age difference between eachother.
malala wanted everyone to be able to get an education and king. wanted equall rights and no racism.
king had 250,000 people at his speech while malala had a lot less but she still had a lot of people there.
King was an activist that wanted equal rights for everyone.
Malala was a girl tht wanted everyone to have acess o education.
They both have experience with their situation.
They both want equal rights for something.
they both used repetition of somthing to use emphases in their s speeches.
They both talked about how their lives were affected by the situation in their speeches.
a compare of their speaches!
Answer:
To me, this statement is kind of a mixture between the realization that you can't and you're not going to win every time you play anything, and your character has to rise above that. We're all going to face failures, whether they be minor or major, sports related or not, but we all have to experience it sooner or later. There's no avoiding it. I think we each have to realize though, that it's not completely the failure itself that is responsible for our actions, but how we respond and cope to the defeat. We can choose to reflect on it for as long as we feel is needed, but we can take past failures and loses, and use them as motivations and teaching moments so that we may have future successes.
Even after they'e declaration of indepedence was issued. Segregation was big in the south.