<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the diminishing state of the Soviet economy, since the Soviet's main argument was that their tactics better served the Russian people economically. </span></span>
Answer and Explanation:
The text shows the difficulty that Caesar Rodney, one of the Delaware delegates, had to participate in the vote on the American Revolution. Caesar Rodney, made a long trip, on horseback, in the rain, sick and with many difficulties, to arrive in time for the vote and ensure that Delaware was not an impediment to the revolution. That's because he knew, that the other delegates, were doubtful about whether the revolution would be a good option for the colonies. They feared that, without the interference of England, the colonies would go into disarray, without knowing how to organize themselves both politically and economically.
However, Rodney believed that the revolution would be the best option for the colonies and that this would bring good results, leaving the colonies stronger, more absolute and more efficient, and for that reason, he made an effort to appear in the vote.
Answer:
Crowned Charlemagne as Emperor of the West...
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
Health and Safety
Environmental laws protect the health and safety of humans and the environment. For example, the Clean Air Act limits emissions of pollutants, and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act prohibits dumping of waste into U.S. ocean waters without a permit. (See References 1 and 4) Without such laws, businesses and individuals might do whatever was most convenient or cost-effective for them, rather than acting for the good of society and the environment.
Innovation
Stricter environmental laws tend to increase innovative environmentally friendly technology, writes Frank Wijen in "A Handbook of Globalization and Environmental Policy." (See Reference 5, Page 216) The demand for sustainable technology rises as companies and individuals must follow stricter environmental regulations, leading researchers and clean energy entrepreneurs to focus on developing such technologies. Ultimately, this increases the prominence of sustainable technologies, making them more accessible.
Costs
Businesses may see certain environmental laws in a negative light if they must adapt their practices and increase spending to comply with regulations. Individuals may feel inconvenienced by particular laws as well, such as a new law against fishing in a favorite spot. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of environmental laws often proves challenging, as negative effects of not implementing these laws -- such as death, illness and ecosystem destruction -- cannot always be easily quantified in monetary terms. (See Reference 2) However, becoming more environmentally friendly may actually save businesses and individuals money in the long term, particularly by reducing waste and energy usage, despite the cost of the initial investment.
Oversights
Environmental laws that impose regulations without considering their impacts on local communities come with a serious disadvantage: lack of local support. For example, a law that commands people to stay out of a protected natural area, without recognizing that people rely on this ecosystem for their own daily needs, may not only constitute a human rights violation, but may actually backfire, says the Center for International Forestry Research. Community participation in ecosystem management helps to ensure compliance with regulations, reports CIFOR.
Explanation:
