<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
The right answers are:
Few opportunities for employment: Even the last one hundred years, feminist movements have fought for getting better the women´s work conditions, we can see nowadays some areas which workforce population is higher in men than women.
Lower wages than men: This phenomena is more common to see in companies located in ways of development countries where women rights have entered in function slower than more developed ones.
Few female supervisors: It could be the consequence of the unequal access to professional formation, which have seen more favorable in men but women.
I think all your answers is correct.
Believe in your work.
Answer:
I think this one might be C but not sure correct me if im wrong . GOOD LUCKKKKK!!!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
This is a strong argument about the state's responsibility in education, but it is not a strong argument that the law is constitutional under the Trade Clause.
Explanation:
In fact, the law is constitutional on the trade clause, but the argument presented above does not refer to this.
The trade clause states that the congress has the power to regulate and manage trade in relation to foreign trade, between states and with indigenous people. However, the above argument represents a reinforcement of the government's responsibility, including congress, to maintain an efficient and safe education, otherwise the trade may be affected.
