Answer:
By having a ling term relationship with the supplier has good and bad effects on buying behavior. I say this because it is a mass struggle for up in coming business entrepreneurs to be able to build long term supplier relationships which makes a lot of businesses end up failing. On the other hand for business that are already pretty established this is a benefit because they do not have to sorry about the suppliers side of bailing out and costing the business a lot of money.
Explanation:
A :)
Im 99% sure it’s right, really hope it is!
This can be worked out as under:
rakhivasavada :
Required Rate of Return r(m) = r(f) + b r(p), where r(f) is the risk free rate and the r(p) is the risk premium and b is beta and therefore:
r(m) = 3.00 + 1.20 * 5.5 = 9.6%.
rakhivasavada :
Hence current price P(0),
= D1/(1+k) +D2/(1+k)^2 + D3/(1+k)^3 + D4/(1+k)^4 + P4/(1+k)^4
D1 = D0 * 1.25 = 1.25*1.25 = 1.25^2
D2 = 1.25D1 = 1.25^3
D3 = 1.25D2 = 1.25^4
D4 = 1.25D3 = 1.25^5
D5 = 1*D4 = 1.25^5 (g = 0, so (1+g) =1)
P4 = D5/k = 1.25^5/0.096
So, P(0)
= 1.25^2/1.096 +1.25^3/1.096^2 +1.25^4/1.096^3 +1.25^5/1.096^4 +1.25^5/(0.096*1.096^4)
= 29.05
rakhivasavada :
I am sure this would help...
rakhivasavada :
Rate this answer ONLY IF you are done with this and if this helps and satisfies you as this is the only way we get compensated for assisting you. You may use "CONTINUE CONVERSATION" to revert with additional queries if you have or if I have missed out on any aspect of your question.
Hope this helps...
Answer:
differentiated by quality/design
Explanation:
In this scenario the two coffee shops have different strategies for sale. While Jackie's coffee is a sit down cafe with a waiter service that takes personalised orders, Johnny's coffee sells at various kiosks it owns.
These two businesses are differentiated by quality or design. Jackie's has more quality because of the personalised service provided to customers.
Jackie uses design of a sit down cafe in one location, while Johnny's business design is to sell coffee at various locations (kiosks)
Answer:
Louise's defense is not valid. She was involved in an Implied-in-fact contracts
Explanation:
Implied-in-fact Contracts
This is a contract that is legally enforceable as a result of an agreement made by conduct and from assumed intentions. These conducts and assumed intentions are derived from the relationship among the involved parties.
When Louise saw Midcity Painters painting her house and made no comments, she became involved a implied-in-fact contract. The conduct of Midcity to paint her house and her conduct to be quiet infact formed a legally enforceable contract.
Louise, therefore, liable. However, due to the lack of contractual terms such as payment for the job done, Louise will be liable for the nominally or typically acceptable rate for such a job done. For instance, if a normal house paint job costs $2000, Louise is liable to pay $2000 for the implied contract.
