Answer:
In eating his lunch, Jim bit down on a bone and chipped his tooth.
Explanation:
Microeconomics studies individual and business decisions while Macroeconomics analysis the decisions made by countries and governments. Microeconomics focuses on supply and demand and other forces that determine price level.
All the sentences support the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain. The one that does it more directly is number 3: But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had any thing to do with her.
Sentences 1 and 2 are simply explaining - by comparing the country to a child - how naive is the claim that, if America once needed Britain, it would always need Britain. It would be the same as saying a child will never eat meat because he/she was first raised my being fed milk.
Sentence 4 is only claiming America has found a lucrative livelihood by taking advantage of European habits and needs.
Sentence 3 makes it clear that, in Paine's opinion, America not only is successful but could have done even better if there had been no interference from Britain at all from the very start. Such connection was not essential for America's development, it only hindered it.
Worsworth wrote this poem in the Romantic period. And it was written in light of his views that people are so invested in spending and earning, that they have altogether forgotten to appreciate the beauties of nature before them.
No there is no such thing instead you may just get into trouble.