1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
3 years ago
6

By the 1700s, France and England were primarily in conflict with each other over

History
2 answers:
oksano4ka [1.4K]3 years ago
7 0
By the 1700s, France and England were primarily in conflict with each other over "territorial expansion", especially when it came to North America, since each nation was trying to harvest resources from the same land. 
Crank3 years ago
5 0

By the 1700s, France and England were primarily in conflict with each other over ____

A) Control of global trade

B) the Rock of Gibraltar

C) The Napoleonic Wars

D) Hostilities left over from the Hundred Years' War

Answer:

<u><em>A) Control of global trade</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Explanation:

During the 1700s, many of Europe's great nations were in competition (and often conflict) with each other for power and influence in other countries.

Hence, they had a strong desire for control of global trade, making A the right answer.

You might be interested in
Pls help me on this<br><br> Im stressed rn
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

I think the answer is C! I may be wrong but the rest don't seem accurate to the history. Good luck!

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2+2=?<br>for those who didnt get to answer the last​
Natalka [10]
4 this was very hard and it took time but here’s the answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the Armenian Genocide?
sdas [7]

Answer:

The signifiance/importance is that the Ottoman Empire failed to take the Suez Canal from the British which failed and tried to take Gallipoli which failed too. The Ottoman Empire blamed this on the Armenians causing 1 million Armenians to be killed.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why did some americans feel that the articles of confederation was not sufficient for the new nation?
denpristay [2]
The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was composed keeping in mind the end goal to join states after the American Revolution. Nonetheless, in light of the fact that the American individuals dreaded solid national governments at the time, it didn't give adequate energy to the central government.
6 0
3 years ago
Many Anglos chose to move to Texas for all of the following reasons, except
Marysya12 [62]
The answer is B. they were looking for work.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does participation in global treaties and organizations help or hinder U.S. sovereignty?
    15·2 answers
  • Describe the conflict between Pincho, Balinger, and Taft. (During the Progressive Era.)
    11·1 answer
  • During the Ming dynasty, why did China enjoy a
    8·1 answer
  • How did mining techniques lead to environmental problems?
    15·2 answers
  • Black fur is dominant to white fur in guinea pigs. If two black guinea pigs (Bb) are crossed what color and in what percentage w
    10·1 answer
  • FREE BRAINLIEST: Colonies attached to the mother-country afford, therefore, the surest means of supporting abroad the sea power
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the relationship between architecture and trade and in Egypt
    12·1 answer
  • What was the result of administrative weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation? The government courts found people guilty
    8·2 answers
  • In market economy what generates the economy? What fuels the economy? Ex. Military spending, Agriculture, etc.
    10·1 answer
  • What does it mean that federal law is superior to state law?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!