I believe that the best answer for this question is a counterargument. Whatever the writer is in support of is the argument. The opposite side would be whatever the opposing, or countering, argument is. For example, if someone is in support of free college, they would support their argument and perhaps include some information about the counterargument, which would be not supporting free college. Hope this helps.
It's "my feelings were not the result of any marked cruelty in the treatment I received; they sprung from the consideration of my being a slave at all. (I believe this is correct cause he thought he was a slave himself. And obviously didnt like it
Answer:
A. In the end, Walton chooses to stop before his endeavor destroys him, but Frankenstein does not.
Explanation:
Walton and Frankenstein's stories are different because in the end, Walton chooses to stop before his endeavor destroys him, but Frankenstein does not.
Frankenstein according to the book was so obsessed with his work that he cared about little else and continued even when he saw the apparent dangers, but Walton stopped before his endeavor destroyed him.
I'm going to go with option B. (The Greeks loved their gods)
Hate is a synonym for Despise and from the passage it doesn't seem like they hated the gods.
The gods were predictable is an alternative, however, we don't have supporting details that they were always right.
And lastly, we know they didn't fear their gods because it states that they believed the gods.<span />
