Answer:
A written and signed document between an employer entity and a labor organization specifying the terms and conditions of employment for a specified period of time is known as a collective bargaining agreement.
Explanation:
The reason why it is collective bargaining agreement is because it binds two or more entities which makes it to be collectively agreed
Answer:
The appropriate response is "Pure competition".
Explanation:
- Pure competition seems to be an economically efficient circumstance where there is already a massive quantity of international customers and retailers as well as the manufacturer would be ready for deployment.
- Even though both a significant quantity of products as well as extremely similar or defined consumer items seem to be characteristics of pure competition.
The benefit of the transcontinental railroad was that it ended many risks of traveling across the country.
<h3>Why was the transcontinental railroad created?</h3>
The American railroad, was created in 1869, with an important innovation through the connection between the coasts of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, having as benefits the expansion of commercial and passenger transport routes in America.
Therefore, the transcontinental railroad was built using mechanized technology in the 19th century, increasing the safety and speed of travel.
Find out more about transcontinental railroad here:
brainly.com/question/11433327
#SPJ1
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
