The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Conflict typically appears when a group is in transition. The forms of conflict you can expect in the types of groups you will lead are misunderstandings, lies, lack of communication, lack of commitment, egotism, a sense of survival, different points of view, fear of change, uncertainty to the unknown, among other.
Often, group members are going to try to survive, trying to defend their positions and protect themselves first, instead of working for the benefits of the organization.
I would attend to these problem group members by showing solid leadership and behaving like a person that has the experience and the knowledge to confront complicated situations with no fear, instead of hiding or running away from problems.
As the leader, I am the first to show the example and my conduct has to be congruent with my words and actions so the members of the group can trust me.
Answer: He behaved clumsy
Explanation:
Fundamental attributional error could be described as someone concluding on what happens to an individual based on the individuals personality or situations around without considering others factors that could lead to the situation. The individual ignores situational factors while judging the fellow. This is what Leila did because of how the man treated someone in a clumsy manner. She judged his calamity based on his being clumsy.
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
The answer is "<span>Generative actions".
Generativity is our want to contribute or increase the value of the lives of other individuals, especially to individuals from more youthful ages who will live on after we ourselves have passed. Basically, generativity is a worry for other individuals, particularly for those more youthful than us, and we can be generative from numerous points of view, including through parenthood, volunteering, educating and tutoring, neighborhood and group activism, or our professions.
</span>
