Answer:
During the debate, Jimmy Carter was the candidate who introduced contentions upheld by proof that was not extremely effective and thusly was fruitless when Ronald Reagan showed proof that his contentions weren't right.
This happened when Carter delivered data that said his administration's rules had the option to diminish the pace of swelling by 10%, which considered better progress on the lookout and a lower pace of joblessness.
Nonetheless, Ronald Reagan countered these contentions with better data upheld by proof, showing that Carter did for sure set up a superior economy through his authority, yet swelling took off during his administration. To demonstrate this, Reagan showed raw numbers that advanced the achievement of his contention.
Are there any multiple choice options?
Answer:
1. Appeal to reason.
2. To show them that he is an expert on voting.
3. To give them reasons for why they should vote.
Explanation:
Answer:
Most people are going to go through many hard and difficult situations in their lifetime. These difficult situations are a big part in the making of a person 's character and who they turn out to be. For example, If a dad was presented with the situation of losing their job, and had no income to support his family, the way he reacts to this difficult time can either make or break himself and his family. This dad could either get unhappy that he lost his job and just give up because he feels like a disappointment, or he could jump back up on his feet and hunt for a job to take care and support his family. This example helps describe how someone can react negatively or positively due to what circumstances are given to them. Just a few months ago,...
Answer: b include minor details
Explanation:
