Both sides had very opposite views of the constitution- the federalist advocated for a strong central government with a national bank while the Anti Federalist believed this would give the central government too much power. In order to compromise the bill of rights was created which stated the rights of the people and the states. The federalist didn’t believe this was necessary because the constitution already stated the states rights, but the anti federalist were not going to budge unless the bill of rights was included. The Great compromise was also created to account for the slaves in the south. The south believed that they should have more representation in the congress due to the higher population when including the slaves than the north. To compromise every 5 slaves counted for 3 citizens, This was called the three-fifths compromise. This rule applied for the House of Rep where the amount of congressmen per state was based on population (favored by the south) , while the senate only allows 2 senators per state (favored by the north).
hope this helps :)
In the 1960 Presidential elections, John F Kennedy became the democratic candidate despite his Catholicism.
This was surprising since Anti-Catholic sentiment was pretty high in mainstream American society at the time.
This was also seen as a reason why his presidential win was the closest in the history of the United States with a margin of just 118,000 out of 69 million votes.
Answer:
While African resistance to European colonialism is often thought of in terms of a white and black/European and African power struggle, this presumption underestimates the complex and strategic thinking that Africans commonly employed to address the challenges of European colonial rule. It also neglects the colonial-era power dynamic of which African societies and institutions were essential components.
After the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, at which the most powerful European countries agreed upon rules for laying claim to particular African territories, the British, French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Belgians, and Portuguese set about formally implementing strategies for the long-term occupation and control of Africa. The conquest had begun decades earlier—and in the case of Angola and South Africa, centuries earlier. But after the Berlin Conference it became more systematic and overt.
The success of the European conquest and the nature of African resistance must be seen in light of Western Europe's long history of colonial rule and economic exploitation around the world. In fact, by 1885 Western Europeans had mastered the art of divide, conquer, and rule, honing their skills over four hundred years of imperialism and exploitation in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. In addition, the centuries of extremely violent, protracted warfare among themselves, combined with the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution, produced unmatched military might. When, rather late in the period of European colonial expansion, Europeans turned to Africa to satisfy their greed for resources, prestige, and empire, they quickly worked their way into African societies to gain allies and proxies, and to co-opt the conquered kings and chiefs, all to further their exploits. Consequently, the African responses to this process, particularly the ways in which they resisted it, were complex.
D it was challenging
Explanation:
Bc im awesome <em>Lol</em>
George Washington is the first president
