Comparing and contrasting European colonization on East Africa and Central and South Africa shows:
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was not as much as other parts of Africa.
South Africa:
- Slavery was rampant.
- Impoverishment of South and Central Africans and wealth to Europeans.
<h3>How was colonization in Southern Africa different from Eastern Africa?</h3>
The colonization in Southern Africa was overall negative as Africans were taken as slaves and treated as inferior to Europeans who took most of the wealth. This was especially the case in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa.
The East Africans were however not subjugated to much slavery and the trade in textiles and metal brought some prosperity.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/1395188
#SPJ1
Answer: c. Cherokees
Explanation:
The Cherokee were said to operate an egalitarian society where men and women were equal and depended on one another to survive by dividing work equally between men and women.
The society was even matrilineal in nature in that the family line came from the mothers. Women were allowed to vote in council meetings and therefore had power.
This changed however when the patriarchal Europeans arrived and disrupted the social cultures of the Native Americans.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
ik bc I'm right thank you
