Answer:
econmic failing the stock market going down and debt
Explanation:
Some argue that this is a misguided question. They say that Locke’s political philosophy is not based on natural law at all, but instead on natural rights, like the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. This is probably the greatest controversy in Locke interpretation today. Natural law theories hold that human beings are subject to a moral law. Morality is fundamentally about duty, the duty each individual has to abide by the natural law. Thomas Hobbes created a new approach when he based morality not on duty but on right, each individual’s right to preserve himself, to pursue his own good—essentially, to do as he wishes.
Is Locke a follower of Hobbes, basing his theory on right rather than natural law? What difference does it make? One characteristic of a rights theory is that it takes man to be by nature a solitary and independent creature, as in Hobbes’s “state of nature.” In Hobbes’s state of nature, men are free and independent, having a right to pursue their own self-interest, and no duties to one another. The moral logic is something like this: nature has made individuals independent; nature has left each individual to fend for himself; nature must therefore have granted each person a right to fend for himself. This right is the fundamental moral fact, rather than any duty individuals have to a law or to each other. The priority of individual right reflects our separateness, our lack of moral ties to one another. According to Hobbes, one consequence of this is that the state of nature is a “war of all against all”: human beings are naturally at war with one another. Individuals create societies and governments to escape this condition. Society is not natural to man, but is the product of a “social contract,” a contract to which each separate individual must consent. The sole purpose of the contract is to safeguard the rights of each citizen.
This is the basic recipe for the political philosophy of liberalism—Locke’s philosophy. Locke speaks of a state of nature where men are free, equal, and independent. He champions the social contract and government by consent. He goes even farther than Hobbes in arguing that government must respect the rights of individuals. It was Locke’s formula for limited government, more than Hobbes’s, that inspired the American Founding Fathers. But what is the basis of Locke’s theory? Is it natural law or Hobbesian natural right? The Founding Fathers, in the Declaration of Independence, speak of both natural rights and natural laws. Locke does likewise. Natural law and natural right may be combined, but if they are, one must take precedence over the other. Either the individual’s right, or his duty to moral law, must come first. hope that helps!
According to Greek Mythology,
Zeus became enamoured with her and descended on her as a golden shower.
She then became with child and birthed a son, Theusus.
Because of a prophecy that predicted her father's death at the hand of his grandson; her father then forced her and her child into a chest and threw it into the sea
Answer:
The Democratic Party
Explanation:
Which group wanted to lower taxes and cut social programs in the South in the late 1800s?
The Democratic Party
In 1865 President Andrew Johnson actualized an arrangement of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free submit managing the change from subjection to opportunity and offered no job to blacks in the governmental issues of the South. The lead of the administrations he set up turned numerous Northerners against the president's arrangements. The end of the Civil War found the country without a settled Reconstruction approach. In May 1865, President Andrew Johnson offered an exculpate to every single white Southerner aside from Confederate pioneers and rich grower (albeit the greater part of these later gotten individual acquits), and approved them to make new governments.
Black people were denied any job all the while. Johnson additionally requested almost all the land in the hands of the administration came back to its prewar proprietors - dashing dark seeks after monetary self-sufficiency. At the start, most Northerners trusted Johnson's arrangement merited an opportunity to succeed. The course pursued by Southern state governments under Presidential Reconstruction, in any case, turned a large portion of the North against Johnson's strategy. Individuals from the old Southern first class, including numerous who had served in the Confederate government and armed force, came back to control. The new assemblies passed the Black Codes, extremely restricting the previous slaves' lawful rights and monetary choices in order to compel them to come back to the estates as needy workers. A few states constrained the occupations open to blacks. None enabled any blacks to cast a ballot or gave open assets to their instruction.
Johnson reasoning is exposed before as how important the new laws were to white leaders, and most radicals were against this. The main supporting argument is that Radicals of Lincoln's GOP wished severe reconstruction. They aforesaid the South was a defeated enemy. They demanded sturdy social control for all southerners WHO took half within the rebellion. These radicals had disliked Lincoln's plans for reconstruction. They felt he was too weak. Now, they hoped Johnson would share their concepts. They urged him to decide a session of Congress to pass robust legislation against the South. The radicals had reason to believe the new president united with them. He had known as the rebels traitors. He had demanded sturdy action against them once the war terminated.
Yet, Andrew Johnson shocked the radicals. He didn't call the exceptional session of Congress. Rather, he declared his own program for the southern states. Johnson pronounced an exculpate for every single previous confederate who guaranteed to help the Union and obey laws against bondage. At that point, he allowed previous authorities of the alliance to keep running for office in their states' new races. A considerable lot of these previous revolutionaries were chosen.
The radicals additionally stressed over what might happen to as of late liberated slaves. They said the new state administrations of the South would not regard blacks as free and equivalent nationals. As confirmation, they indicated new laws the southern assemblies passed. The extreme Republicans chose that President Johnson's recreation program must be halted. They started attempting to gain the power of Congress to pass their own program. Just by increasing political power would they be able to rebuff the South and assurance full political rights to previous slaves. So that, the radicals endeavored to take control in two different ways. To start with, they declined to let a large number of them as of late chosen southern congressmen sit down when Congress opened. At that point, they framed their very own joint board of trustees on reproduction. This panel - not the Senate or the House of Representatives - would settle on a significant number of the choices about recreation.
