D- Connotative, Abstract, because connotative is the way the writer feels towards the word. That is why they used it, to give it their own definition.<span />
The main idea of the paragraph is that women should be credited for much more during the prehistoric times that they are at the moment. We only get the picture of them being rather irrelevant at the time which is obviously not true, based on this excerpt. The paragraph is quite feminist, meaning that it is shedding light on actual history and the role of women in such a society which not much is spoken about in contemporary analyses.
They were the ones who invented gardening, as well as pottery and weaving. The reason why they did this was because they often stayed 'at home' taking care of children, so they had time to do other things as well, while men were out hunting and providing for the family in other ways. Thus we have solid proof that women were far more creative and responsible for various things than they are credited for now.
Answer:
I guess it is true
Explanation:
not sure but hope it helps
Well, it really depends on which theory of intelligence you are referring to. According to some psychologists, there are many more types of intelligences than just these three. But, if you are referring to Sternberg's theory, then it is <u>false</u><u /> that the facets of intelligence include practical, experiential, and creative intelligences. It is true that they include practical and experiential, but instead of creative, it is componential intelligence.
Answer:
SHORT VERSION: There is no smoke without fire is a proverb or saying which explains about some rumours or assumptions.
Above saying explains that as smoke won't be liberated unless there is presence of fire any rumor or news wont get spread without any initiative.
So behind any rumor the will be a chance of truth in most of the cases.
LONGER VERSION: As the saying goes, "there's no smoke without fire", it is rue to say that there is always some truth to whatever has bee implied. This is used majorly in the case of spreading rumors or some events though without the presence of any evidence to prove it.
When anything is implied, but there is no proof whatsoever, it is safe to assume that there is some truth to whatever has been implied. Once a person says something like an accusation or even a false rumor or implication, there must be some truth behind it for the rumor to start. If someone implied that he heard someone tell about an upcoming market fair, it can be implied that he got the information from somewhere else or he wouldn't have just come up with the knowledge by himself. he heard someone say something about it and then decided to tell someone else and thus help spread the information. Though he did not possess any evidence or proof of the fair, there is some truth behind it. Just like smoke cannot come or be made by itself and requires a fire to get smoke, there is always some truth behind any accusation or rumor.
Explanation:
