Answer:
He would one day be the one who would blind Polyphemus
Explanation:
Grammar
Internal conflict: character vs. self because the writer of the poem is struggling with a conflict within herself, getting over feelings for someone they held dear.
Answer: Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective; Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition.
Explanation:
Both works are written in an Old English poetic style: There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
<u></u>
Beowulf characterizes Grendel as bloodthirsty, but Grendel shows Grendel’s gentler side. - Grendel is a monster;
<u></u>
Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective. Yes, it is a monster;
Both works focus primarily on the hero, Beowulf. - There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition. - Beowulf is the hero of the work; Grendel in Norse mythology, Grendel is a monstrous character.
I believe the correct answer is <span>Zaroff has no conscience, while Rainsford does have a conscience.
As you can see in the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering other people, which he considers to be just a type of hunting. He doesn't value human life at all, and is indifferent towards whether they live or die, which is why his character is different from that of Rainsford's.
</span>
