Achieving at a high level is al about making sacrifices. For example, young Olimpic athletes often practice many hours a day even while attending to school and completing homework. In this case, their commitment to fitness extends to their diet and sleep schedule. In comparison to other kids their age, their lives are very regulated, and there is not a lot of time for hanging out with friends. As shown above it is not only talent that separates Olympic athletes from the rest, it is also their willingness to make the necessary sacrifices.
Answer:
edgar allen poe
Explanation:
can i get a brainliest please
Because if those two are together, then it's like they don't have to choose which one to love more or something.
Epic heroes are generally the main characters in epic poems. They also typically represent their culture by embodying the values that their culture admires. For example, Odysseus is the main character in the Greek epic, "Odyssey". Odysseus was a quick thinker and clever, which Greeks at the time greatly admired. Epic heroes may also possess superhuman strength or military skill.
Epic poems are specifically a genre of poetry in the classical world. These poems are generally long, narrative poems that are concerned with a serious subject. They focus on the exploits of the epic hero and are told in elevated style of language. Finally, the success or failure of the epic hero may be responsible for the fate of the hero's people or nation.
Ancient Greek and Roman texts, such as "Odyssey" and the "Aeneid," most accurately represent epic poetry. Many critics apply the term to other works of poetry from other cultures around the world, however. "Beowulf" is often called an Anglo-Saxon epic, and "Paradise Lost" may be considered an epic of Christian culture.
To make it short it's :
An epic hero is defined as a character in an epic poem is noble and brave and it's affected by a great events or admired for his achievements.
The first four options are all valid statements. The last one makes no
sense, as it implies that at the time the constitution was written women
were less deserving of rights than they were at the point she was
writing, which would not be a point in keeping with her wider message.