Answer:
I would say to ignore them.
Explanation:
my second choice would be find a way to argue against the harmful perspectives, but if you argue, it kight make it worse
Answer:
<em>H</em><em>ow</em><em> </em><em>much</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>spent</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>these</em><em> </em><em>activities</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>them</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
The writer describes events in chronological order
Explanation:
It can be noticed that the writer describes events in chronological order because he/she is telling a story. Generally, In narrative writing, the narrator should follow a chronological order for the reader to understand the story. Obviously, not all stories are told chronological. In this particular case, the years mentioned (1808, 1810, 1812 and 1815) helps the reader to follow the story, as well as have a context.
I believe that the correct answer here is the first option.
Here we see a narrator who is addressing a fight that has already happened and here we see that he is pride. We see that in his clear opinion of the fighting and the belief in his skill, because he would not wait for darkness, because he would not need that, as he is certain that he is good enough to win a fight in broad daylight. Here we see the narrators pride.
