They prayed at different places
they also had different leaders
they believed in different reasons of life
Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
Answer:
Douglass states that Mr Covey gave him "very severe whipping, cutting my back..." This line is great evidence that supports the mean idea as it shows how slaves are treated worse than animals even. The rest of the passage provides various scenarios, all leading up to the main idea. Douglass states that he has "marks visible for a long time after." This further brings up the inexcusable actions that were done to the slaves. Animals may be treated badly from time to time but the slaves were constantly victims to lashings of anger.
Paragraph 2:
(I don't have the actual passage so i can't give evidence sorry, just put some quotes in alongside it)
The hypocrisy came from the people who slaved to the slaves. Religiously, not many people agreed on it , however, it still thrived due to the different variations in the religious beliefs. People that appeared 'religious' and that were wealthy could do anything with the slaves and no one would object because after all they were religious.
Explanation:
The correct answer is where the royal power was weak or non-existent
Whenever there was a king that couldn't keep everyone in line, the local lords would band up on him or would become more and more independent and it would be difficult to control them since they would often work even with foreign powers against their own lords. This led to the downfall of numerous dynasties or emperors in Europe.
Initially the movement operated chiefly at the local level but it later expanded to the state and national levels progressives drew support from the middle class and the supporters included many lawyers teachers physicians and ministers and business people
