Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
The story is told from the view point of the story's protagonist, Thomas.
Answer:
The social costs of cell phone usage are caused from the unhealthy addiction, interfering with ordinary activities in daily life as well as causing conflicts among family members or relationships in the society.
This is because people when uses phone for much time, they have the symptoms that an addict may have. They rely on phones to lift their moods. due to this dependence, when there is no phone in their sight, they may have anxiety or be in panic, which is the major cause for their bad attitude, temper influencing negatively their daily life and relationships.
Answer:
ummmmm....
Explanation:
-"You should repent for your sins. They will destroy you. You stand no chance. You will die on his hand. Express sincere regret"-
Answer:
They might desire an active role in world transformation. They are hopeful for a better future as a "strange attractor".
They might believe they are pragmatists in this world, even as they imagine and work for another.
People of the future have a long term perspective.
