The overwhelming consensus of observers in the 1890s, and historians ever since, is that an upsurge of humanitarian concern with the plight of the Cubans was the main motivating force that caused the war with Spain in 1898. McKinley put it succinctly in late 1897 that if Spain failed to resolve its crisis, the United States would see “a duty imposed by our obligations to ourselves, to civilization and humanity to intervene with force."Intervention in terms of negotiating a settlement proved impossible—neither Spain nor the insurgents would agree. Louis Perez states, "Certainly the moralistic determinants of war in 1898 has been accorded preponderant explanatory weight in the historiography."
By the 1950s, however, American political scientists began attacking the war as a mistake based on idealism, arguing that a better policy would be realism. They discredited the idealism by suggesting the people were deliberately misled by propaganda and sensationalist yellow journalism. Political scientist Robert Osgood, writing in 1953, led the attack on the American decision process as a confused mix of "self-righteousness and genuine moral fervor," in the form of a "crusade" and a combination of "knight-errantry and national self- assertiveness."
The Blitzkrieg. This was Utilized by Invading Belgium and Sending Tanks through the Argonne Forest. The encirclement of the Maginot was also an important Tactic/Decision which led to the Surrender of the Majority of the French Army and forced the British to retreat to Dunkirk and Evacuate over the Channel.
Answer:
It is for education.
Explanation:
The article 26–2 of the United Nations Universal declaration describe the importance and necessity of education. According to article 26–2 everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free to all people at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory for every child. Technical and professional education shall be provided by the government and higher education shall be accessible equally to all people on the basis of merit.
<span>Historical claims that are logically and factually strong are said to have "D. Validity," since this means that the claims are "valid" and therefore come from reliable and trustworthy sources. </span>
- The suitable answer which best describes the amendment process is: "It is an intentionally difficult process in which an amendment must be proposed and approved by 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of the state legislative before being ratified by 3 fourths of the States.
- A more detailed explantion for the amendment process would be the following:
The Constitution of the United States, more precisely, the Article V of the Constitution, states that an amendment may be proposed by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
After that, the original document is sent to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR). The latter examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency as well as an authenticating signature.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Costitution the moment in which it is ratified by three-fourths of the States. Then, the OFR validates the required ratification documents and it drafts a formal proclamation to the Archivist, who immediately conveys a certified copy of the State action to the Director of the Federal Register so as to certify the amendment is valid.
Last but not least, this certification is published in the Federal Register and the U.S. Statutes at Large and it functions as the official notice to the Congress that the amendment process has been finished.
