Answer:
d.) I and II
Explanation:
The first proposition can be regarded as proposition that gives a clam that capital structure of a company has no impact on the value. The value of a company is been known as present value of future cash flows when it's calculated, then it cannot be affected by capital structure. It should be noted that MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that capital structure can affect firm value by an amount that is equal to the present value of the interest tax shield.
hey there!:
1)
a) Amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions = 2896.21
(56900*3.1%*90%)+(56900*(5.4%-3.1%)) = 2896.21
b) Amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax = 517.79
(56900*6%)-2896.21 = 517.79
c) Amount that the company lost because of its late payments = 176.39
=517.79-(3414-1763.9-1308.7) = 176.39
Hope that helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is: the cost of it.
Explanation:
To begin with, knowing that planning, organizating, controling and directing are the basis of an structured company in order to achieve efficiently those there is a cost that has to be done, therefore that the major drawback of becoming more structured in the company is the cost of doing it, due to the fact that creating documents and teaching every one how to use it and more, the costs of the company will increase as well as the company will become more structured.
Answer:
The best solution
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
According the utilitarian approach actions and plans should be taken<span> in a way that will produce the greatest benefit to society and produce the least harm at lowest cost and</span> judged by their consequences. The utilitarian approach proposes that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences. research reveals that stakeholders who have the ability to affect the company have the most power; whereas stakeholders that have legitimacy have a legal or moral claim on company resources.
