Answer:
Items 1–10 are each worth two points, for a twenty-point assessment. Each part of a
EBSR is worth 1 point; MSR and TECR items should be answered correctly in full, though
you may choose to provide partial credit. If you decide to have students complete the
constructed response, use the correct response parameters provided in the Answer Key
along with the scoring rubric listed below to assign a score of 0 through 4.
Score: 4
• The student understands the question/prompt and responds suitably using the
appropriate text evidence from the selection or selections.
• The response is an acceptably complete answer to the question/prompt.
• The organization of the response is meaningful.
• The response stays on-topic; ideas are linked to one another with effective transitions.
• The response has correct spelling, grammar, usage, and mechanics, and it is written
neatly and legibly.
Score: 3
• The student underst
Explanation:
Answer: D. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” certainly differ in writing techniques and language use. In Jackson's speech, there are long sentences, which makes the speech convincing and helps him demonstrate his intelligence. However, Rutledge's sentences are often short, quite simple and straightforward.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
If you read sentence 3, you'll see that it says "a bunch." This is very informal. D could've been a contender, but it was needlessly wordy and it made the paper hard to read. So, A is the correct choice. :)
In the system of voluntary restriction, if one person takes more than his or her share, it will ruin the system for everyone
