1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
14

What was the purpose of the Inquisition?

History
1 answer:
AlekseyPX3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Stop the spread of ideas considered heretical.

Explanation:

It was represented throughout the Middle Ages in many European countries, and even later, to a lesser extent in the new century. Its function is to deal with Christian non-believers, and anyone who is thought to defame the church and its teaching in any way. The most famous was the Spanish Inquisition, which stood out for its brutality and intensity.

The Spanish Inquisition was the most brutal for the reason that Muslims lived in the Spanish neighborhood for a specified period. For this reason, they often initiated inquisitorial procedures to let their people know what would happen to them if they "converted". The Inquisition had various techniques and devices for the torture of all those considered heretics. Of the gadgets, we can point out the Iron Maiden, the Copper Taurus, the Straw, the Pillar of Shame, and many others.

You might be interested in
Below are ten scenarios governed by the bill of rights write the number of the correct amendment beside each scenario
matrenka [14]
There is no picture for someone to state the correct answer
5 0
3 years ago
as a factory owner durung the industrial revolution write a letter to a newspaper justifying working conditions in your factory
mihalych1998 [28]
When writing this letter, you should include the fact that although regulations were limited and there were frequent worker injuries, productivity was high in the factory, which led to increased output and subsequently increased GDP for the state and country. 
3 0
3 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8
Kay [80]

Answer: control of power by hereditary landholding class

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did Jefferson origins leave him I’ll-suited to lead or embody a social revolution?
jeka57 [31]
Jefferson’s listing of abuses and violations of basic rights and clearly aimed at the King of Britain and his monarchy. The Declaration brought recognition of these injustices to every citizen, and hence, justification of the American Revolution
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Instruments for sailing was not invented during the Renaissance?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the new musical style introduced in the enlightenment
    8·1 answer
  • What caused the United States to break its neutrality and enter World War I
    12·2 answers
  • What is Lincoln planning to do with the south after the war has ended?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help!
    11·1 answer
  • What factors caused social conflicts between settlers on the Great Plains and native Americans
    8·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 20
    14·1 answer
  • What is the Stoa in Greek Architecture?
    13·2 answers
  • The United States made the Louisiana Purchase in order to gain control of which of the following? Select all that apply.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of José de Martin revolution?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!