Answer:
It really depends on your definition of government. Not very helpful I know...
Explanation:
I doubt that it is 3. Although it is possible. If a government is a body that passes laws then it is most probably 2, a monarchy. The first monarchy originated in about 400 BC. Before that, humans just worked for whoever owned the farms. Tribal rule is also possible as humans did create tribes to hunt and gather and it is likely they had a leader or "alpha-male". Anyway, good luck with answering that question without getting into some serious semantics.
A key difference<span> seen </span>between<span> democracy and </span>communism<span> is </span>in the<span> type of economic </span>systems. In a democracy, a free economy or capitalism is adopted Individual rights to own property are respected. In communism, <span> the government to take control of all the capital and industry in the country in an effort to get rid of economic inequality. </span>
Answer: I think the unknown substance is water.
Explanation: mark me the brainly-est
Answer:
Before 1750, the European country begin to Industrialize in light of that those country started their inquiry for the crude material, so those country began to colonize other country in look for the crude materials.
Preceding the British appearance In India, the Mughal domain was rule however the majority of the South Asia followed the religion of Hinduism and since the Mughal realm was ruled by a Muslim domain, People of south east were not faithful to the leader of the Mughal domain. This is the point at which the British east Indian organization saw this as a chance and make union with the local ruler to take in desire to oust Mughal Empire.
This drove sepoy Mutiny which was Indian individuals In the British east Indian organization. Albeit the Indian Sovereigns practiced their force in many, anyway a large portion of the Indian state's ruler practice their force
they didn't haven't any force after they made a partnership and attempted to retaliate with them and British had more prominent impact than the Indian rulers .
Indian ruler didn't have more prominent impact than the British east Indian organization. In this answer Its Suggest by the Emperor of the Southeast Indian that ruler of the Tanjore are not faithful and they ought not make a union with the British East Indian organization since they resemble the France.
This shows the steadfastness of the Indian Emperor to the British East Indian organization further demonstrating the Indian demonstrating that the sovereign had little force than the British. Furthermore,It demonstrates the East India Organization had more prominent force than the Indian ruler on the grounds that the authority of the organization John Malcolm is advancing that the organization will attempt to secure the local Indian Principalities.
