1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
4 years ago
11

Why did the military dictatorships crack down on workers, students, and native peoples?

History
1 answer:
fredd [130]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

They were subversive against the government.

Explanation:

Although the word subversive might be a bit strong. It's better to say that they were the opposition to the military dictatorship, because being subversive usually has the implication of arming oneself against the government, and neither the workers nor the students nor the native peoples were armed.

These are social groups that fought for democracy during the military dictatorship, and because of that, suffered from great oppression. Many leaders of student organizations, labor unions, and native communities were incarcerated, murdered, or disappeared.

You might be interested in
Most African Americans who moved to the North from the South found:
juin [17]

A. Jobs on railroads or in factories.

Had problems in the south so they went to the north for jobs.

5 0
3 years ago
Look at the image above. Based on the information provided on the map, which
kolezko [41]

Answer: Europe had colonized nearly all of Africa

Explanation:

In what was known as the Scramble for Africa, European powers from the late 19th century to the early 20th century, took control of most of Africa in order to access its resources, markets, spread Christianity and acquire more power in a period when competition amongst European powers was at its zenith.

All of Africa with the exception of Ethiopia and Liberia were colonized in this period with the British and the French coming off best out of the European powers.

7 0
3 years ago
Does big government pose moral problems ?
almond37 [142]

Answer:

Short answer YES

Explanation:

Because law by its very nature concerns moral judgments, a government that stands under the rule of law presupposes the existence of a moral order, expresses the social concept of that order, and in turn encourages the fundamental moral principles of a society, particularly regarding justice. Sustaining limited government and freedom turns on the question of how virtue is cultivated and which communities and institutions are most appropriate for this task.Such a shift in the public's attitude toward expansive government can weaken democracy, given that diversification of authority among local associations is a strong check against government tyrannyAll political communities, including nation-states, are held together by civic bonds or "ties that bind." As the motto of the United States-e pluribus unum,or "out of many, one" -implies, the kinds of obligations that unite its many members into one people are of critical importance. These bonds often take the form of moral obligations that we owe one another as members of the same community.National governments do not, for example, attract citizens to the good of compassion with the same power as other social institutions because they bind citizens to a sovereign state, or to an impersonal law, rather than to other citizens directly. desires to bind its "many" into "one" to limit its power and its purse, leaving primary responsibility for moral formation in the hands of local moral communities. Only these associations and institutions can foster true justice and compassion for those in need-a fact that makes them essential for the cultivation of virtuous citizens and the prevention of governmental tyranny.

4 0
4 years ago
Anti-Federalists chose to ratify the Constitution largely because of the promise of a bill of individual rights. However, they s
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

The Federalists Managed to avoid the Anti- Federalists because they were two different groups. The Federalists were with the ratification but the Anti-Federalists were against the ratification which let to the colonies.

Explanation:

<3

8 0
2 years ago
What impact did commercial activity have on the Ottoman Empire? the Mughal Empire?
Lerok [7]

Answer:

The Ottoman Empire came in World War I as one of the Central Powers. The Ottoman Empire entered the war by carrying out a surprise attack on Russia's Black Sea coast on 29 October 1914, with Russia responding by declaring war on 5 November 1914. Ottoman forces fought the Entente in the Balkans and the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I. The Ottoman Empire's defeat in the war in 1918 was crucial in the eventual dissolution of the empire in 1921.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is campaign finance a concern in the united states?
    10·1 answer
  • 10. The first division of political parties came about because of what issue?
    8·1 answer
  • Did the japanese attack pearl harbor because of the oil embargo?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did early civilizations begin in river valleys?
    5·2 answers
  • The major political party in the U.S generally has a stance of wanting less government involvement in the lives of citizens?
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement about Eleanor Roosevelt is true?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did parliament pass the navigation acts?
    8·1 answer
  • According to the 1790 census, where did enslaved people live within the United States? only in the South in every single state i
    7·1 answer
  • 5. Which of the following best describes King Louis XVI? *
    11·1 answer
  • During the 1860s, the United States occupied the Midway Islands and acquired Alaska. Why did America expand into these new terri
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!