Answer: Nike
Explanation:
Brand Repositioning is a strategy adopted by brands to reach out to more customers by redefining what the company is about. This is geared at making the customers see how the products relate to them.
Nike is an example of a brand that has undergone repositioning due to insufficient sales and changing demographics.
During the last lap of the 1980's, the company had just suffered a major blow in their financial status which led to sales contraction and the laying off of many workers. This led to a series of discussions between heads of advertising and marketing on how to reposition the brand.
Finally, they tapped into the benefits of sports merged with the values and aim of the company of reaching out to everyone, to create the Just do it campaign which had a really positive impact on sales.
Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.
You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):
Contractor Cost Time
A 100 20
B 80 25
C 79 28
D 82 26
The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.
Explanation:
So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.
Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.
So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.
Answer:
nice nice nice, nice pfp lol-
Answer:
D. Vigilant interaction theory
Explanation:
It is correct to say that Alexa and David are employing the theory of vigilant interaction to increase productivity.
This theory is related to the team's decision-making process, that is, its objective is the integration and collaboration of the entire group with innovative and creative contributions that help in solving problems, helping in a more effective decision-making that contributes for the positive end result of the team.
Therefore, when using the strategy of increasing the sense of competition in the teams, managers seek the theory of vigilant interaction so that the final result and the goals of the teams are achieved.
<span>software publishers,software purchasers,the government hope that helps</span><span>
</span>